Starter Articles Archives

Values and Political Views

October 12, 2021September 22, 2022 Brent Leave a comment

As mentioned in my exploration of moral foundations theory, there are six moral values that people feel. But everyone doesn’t weigh every value equally. Some people may believe the Care value is the most important, but others may disagree. If you’re interested in learning about your values, I recommend taking the Your Morals online survey, which has been completed by hundreds of thousands of people to support research. It’s like a personality test; it’s fun!

Studies like this have led to important scientific findings. Most prominently, political views have been found to be correlated with different sets of moral values. So far, three “moral palettes” – different weightings of the six values – have been tracked:

Toolbox: Moral Foundations Theory

September 26, 2021November 13, 2022 Brent Leave a comment

“Toolbox” articles delve into a new way of looking at values, with a view to using these techniques in future articles.

The first tool, moral foundations theory, is especially important for understanding future articles. Developed by Craig Joseph, Jesse Graham, and (most famously) Jonathan Haidt, moral foundations theory states that there are six fundamental values that explain our moral views. Every person holds all six values to differing degrees, and these values can broadly explain why people have moral reactions to similar situations. In fact, the authors of moral foundations theory go as far to argue that the political differences between liberals and conservatives can be explained through the analysis of the strength of each value – both absolutely and relative to each other – in each group’s moral worldview.

Values Added: Mission Statement

September 26, 2021May 17, 2022 Brent Leave a comment

Public servants always talk about the “value added”; it’s time to add some values.

Economic impact estimates. Cost-benefit analyses. The t-test. In addition to being dreadful topics to bring up on a first date, these are the bread-and-butter tools of policy analysts. We count the costs, summarize the benefits, and make policy recommendations on these grounds. When we talk about trade-offs, it’s usually between rational and quantifiable goods: growth vs. equity; small benefits to many vs. major losses to few; cost vs. effectiveness. Having collected information and having made our recommendations, we then punt the final decision to elected representatives, who are responsible for selecting the correct approach in line with the public interest.

No doubt, this system has led to major successes, as evidenced by the good governance of the Canadian public service. Politically motivated hysterics aside, the Canadian government works, and the same can’t be said about many governments around the world. The high-quality analysis of the Canadian public service deserves plenty of credit for the country’s flourishing over the past century-and-a-half. I would never suggest that these methods should be abandoned.